Murat Ülker, the boss of Yıldız Holding, who bought the 40-acre plot remaining on the Canal Istanbul route in 2006 from Kemallettin Erbakan, the owner of Milli Gazete, for 20 million TL. It sold to its partnership. Emlak Konut transferred half of the land in question to THY Real Estate Partnership in 2018.
Ministry of Environment and Urbanization made watering (reincluding immovable immovable in the zoning plan) on February 4, 2019, on the land where the immovables are located.
Surprise witness list
In 1976, within the scope of the ‘Selametköy Project’, 432 beneficiaries who claimed that they bought the land sold from Milli Gazete in the presence of a notary and by drawing lots, filed a lawsuit against the landowners and the landowners in 2015.
The plaintiffs who asked the court for their title deeds or demanded their compensation be presented to the court a list of surprise witnesses at the court hearing the previous day.
Among them are names such as AKP deputies Numan Kurtümüş, Ravza Kavakçı, Mustafa Ataş, Former İBB President Kadir Topbaş, business person Murat Ülker, Kemalettin Erbakan, former ministers Şevket Kazan, Oğuzhan Asiltürk, founder of Yeni Akit Newspaper Mustafa Karahasanoğlu, Süleyman Mercümek took. In the petition submitted to the court, “Witnesses are people who set up and implement this contract”.
ÜLKER LAWYER: WE ARE NOT OWNERS OF INFORMATION AND INFORMATION
The lawyer of Defendant Yıldız Holding stated that Murat Ülker did not have a direct experience and knowledge and demanded that the request to be heard from the witnesses be rejected.
THY: WE ARE THE BEST THIRD IN THE CASE
The lawyer of defendant THY Gayrimenkul Yatırım ve İşlet A.Ş stated that they submitted their contract with Emlak Konut to the file, “There is no annotation in the title deed at the date of the contract. Therefore, my client is the third person in good faith in this case. ” The defendant company lawyers also requested that the case be rejected, claiming that there was a timeout in the case.
The hearing was postponed
The court, which decided to make a discovery on the land on which the aforementioned properties were located, decided to inform the court about the subjects on which the persons in the witness list were to be heard, together with their addresses. The hearing was postponed.
“THERE WAS NO OTHER OBJECTIONS AFTER TIME OUT”
Atıf Şenel, the plaintiff’s lawyer, said, “We have two requests for those who are not deed in our case. First; is the land title of these places. My clients received the tender opened on condition that they paid all of the money of these places. Published by Milli Gazete. Notary draw was made and the results were also revealed. There is not any aspect to discuss whether the issue of trading is done or not. Moreover, the other party did not submit any objection to us except for the timeout. Our second request is, if you can’t give our goods, give our money. ”
